![]() |
| Empire awake. |
![]() |
| Empire, at rest on a sofa at the rescue place. |
2ND EDIT: (2/19/2021) After checking his records, I can confirm that Empire will be 5 months old exactly tomorrow, February 20, 2021; he was born on September 20, 2020.
This blog is about historic costume, primarily Western costume, from the dawn of history until about 1600 C.E. Certain exceptions may apply.
![]() |
| Empire awake. |
![]() |
| Empire, at rest on a sofa at the rescue place. |
| Zola, at about 5 years old. |
Recently, the National Museum in Copenhagen, Denmark, reconstructed two complete outfits, a man's outfit and a woman's. The man's outfit is based upon a grave in Bjerringhøj, in Jutland, Denmark. The woman's outfit is based upon a grave at Hvilehøj, also in Jutland. Both are dated to the 10th century CE.
The University of Oslo's Museum of Cultural History has created a virtual web exhibition based on these costumes, which may be read and viewed here. Further discussion may be read on the reconstruction project's Instagram, which can be accessed here. This post is based upon the information that appears in the web exhibition.
![]() |
| Left: reconstruction of the costume of the man buried at Mammen, Denmark. Photo via Wikimedia Commons* |
Both the man and the woman are depicted as wearing outer garments made from fur; a cloak in the case of the woman and a coat in the case of the man. Both wear goatskin shoes, in styles copied from shoes found in Hedeby. The man's clothes also drew upon the textile finds in the man's grave at Mammen (also in Jutland), which has also been dated to the 10th century.
The man's clothes feature a belt that ends in large triangular pendants. The insides of these pendants are decorated with nalbinded fabric fashioned of silver and gold threads, rather like the large bands (believed to have been cloak ends) of the Mammen costume. His undyed wool shirt is decorated with colored embroidery of a number of different motifs, including motifs found on the man's tunic at Mammen. The reconstruction includes tablet woven bands trimming the edges of the shirt sleeves and pants, but the grave find appears to indicate that the Bjerringhøj man's shirt was trimmed with red silk fabric in a samite weave, decorated with a gold-thread heart motif. That fabric was reproduced separately, and a photograph of the reconstructed samite also appears in the web exhibition.
The woman's gown is made from wool, with woven-in geometric designs in the chest area (because all of the geometrically decorated wool in her grave was found in the chest area). Remains of tablet woven bands with metal threads were found in her grave, and appear as part of the edging on her fur cloak. No brooches, either tortoise-shaped or otherwise, were found in the grave, and therefore none appear in the reconstruction, but some glass beads were found, which are reproduced as a necklace. A Frankish coin from the middle of the 10th century appears to have been the centerpiece of this necklace.
Without more specific information about the actual textile scraps recovered, it is impossible to deduce all of the reasons supporting these costume interpretations (e.g., why was the man's costume reproduced with yellow pants?). I will be looking out for a report of the reconstructions, and reviewing the Instagram account of the project very closely!
EDIT: (1/17/2021) I recommend checking out the project's Instagram (link above). It contains a number of pictures not featured in the web exhibition, including a back view of the man's reconstructed coat.
* Nationalmuseet - The National Museum of Denmark from Denmark, CC BY-SA 2.0
Recently, I learned that the Handcrafted History blog contains a wealth of free tutorials--51 to be exact--for projects of various complexity and length. The blog is a wonderful place to explore, particularly if your costuming interests lie in the medieval period.
Many of the tutorials are in English, though some are in Swedish. Many of them are for 15th century clothing, though by no means all--there are a few tutorials for Viking age clothing. and one for a "bathhouse babe" type of sleeveless shift. All are well-illustrated with color photographs. I suspect that the ones in Swedish could be adequately navigated by English-speakers using Google Translate.
Linda, the blogger, runs a small (mostly) historical clothing business. You can find her on Instagram (where I first found her), Facebook, Etsy, and Patreon. Her Etsy site sells kits which consist of patterns and instructions to make small projects. Note that if you decide to contribute to her Patreon account, she will be able to make more free tutorials available on her blog.
EDIT: 12/22/2020 Corrected description about Linda's kits, which include patterns and instructions but NOT materials.
![]() |
| Beads found at Hestnes, in Central Norway. (Photo: Åge Hojem, NTNU University Museum) |
The researchers were surprised to discover a grave, because no other graves have been found anywhere nearby. Even more interestingly, the grave was nothing like any other Viking era grave finds in Central Norway. It was a chamber grave, of which few if any have been found previously in this region. Such graves are characteristic of more urbanized areas than Central Norway, such as Birka and Hedeby. It was possible to tell the burial had been a chamber grave from the imprints left were the supporting poles had been, the remains of the chamber walls, and the size of the "chamber" where the remains lay. The way chamber graves are built, the "chamber" is dug into the earth, and a lid is placed upon the top after the deceased person and her grave goods have been deposited. This particular grave has been dated to between 850 - 950 CE.
The article from partner.sciencenorway.no does not mention any textile remains, but there were a number of jewelry finds, including a pair of double-shelled tortoise brooches, a tri-lobed brooch, and a large number of tiny beads. A photograph of the tiny beads that appeared in the article is reproduced with this post. 339 of the tiny beads had been located as of when the article was written, each of which is between 1-2 mm in size. Beads in that size range are typically called "seed beads" today, and they have been, and still are, used for embroidery on clothing. The article observes that, according to one of the NTNU researchers, a similar find at Hedeby has been interpreted as containing the remains of beaded embroidery.
The tortoise brooches, which at other sites have been found to contain bits of textile from the dead woman's clothing, here contained fragments of bone and teeth, which have not yet been analyzed. A spindle whorl was also found in the grave.
It was suggested by one of the researchers that the woman had come to Hestnes from the south (e.g. closer to Hedeby or nearby areas) and had been buried with jewelry characteristic of her home region.
I will be looking out for analyses of this grave in the hope that some textiles, or other materials giving a clue as to her costume, are eventually located. I will also look out for articles on other Viking women's graves containing large numbers of seed beads. Perhaps we are looking at the first hints of finds showing another distinctive fashion among some Viking women.
Today I learned that it's easy to search, and locate pictures of, historical textiles in the Ashmolean's Eastern Art collection in Oxford, England.
![]() |
| Feed sack of type used to make clothing. (Wikimedia Commons). |
It's an article about the clothing Americans made with used feed and flour sacks during the period from the 1910s to the 1950s. Most of this clothing was made during the Great Depression of the 1920s and 1930s, when money was dear, everyone was suffering together, and if you had to spend money on anything you wanted to get as much for it as possible. The article may be read here; it's likely you will need to create a login to read it, but doing so is free of charge. You can create your login here.
In our present age of disposable packaging (light cardboard, easy to tear paper or plastic) it's hard to imagine making anything out of feed sack material that anyone would be willing to wear. But the feed sacks of the time were made from good quality cloth, usually cottons--osnaburg, sheeting, percale, muslin. The lighter sacks (used for flour) made good underwear, while the stronger feed bags were used for shirts, dresses, aprons, trousers. The design of the resulting garments, of course, was limited only by the imagination and skill of the woman doing the sewing, and the number of feed sacks available to her.
Originally, all such sacks were white, and women who were not willing to clothe their families entirely in white would dye them. But by the mid-1920s manufacturers printed labels in ink that could be washed out, or on separate labels that could be removed, and they began making the bags out of gingham or good quality prints that would not look out of place when the sacks were used as clothing. The Piecework article starts with a nice photograph of a young girl in a feed sack dress.
Manufacturers continued to make feed sacks from patterned cloth into the 1950s, but by that time World War II rationing was over and the Great Depression was at best a fading memory for many. In the post-war era of prosperity, women could afford to buy fabric intended for home sewing of clothes, or even ready-made clothes themselves. By the early 1960s, the day of feed sack fashion was over.
The article is nicely illustrated, well-written, and has its own bibliography. I recommend it to readers interested in the clothing of early 20th century America.
![]() | ||
|
Or so the current state of public knowledge goes. I learned tonight that Aarhus University Press is planning to augment that knowledge with a three-volume series of books, called "Returning to Gokstad," that will review the Gokstad finds: 1) in light of other visits to the site over the last few decades; 2) other ship mound burials from Hedeby, Ladby and Sutton Hoo, and 3) the results of applying new scientific techniques to those finds, such as iron provenancing, aDNA, isotope analysis, osteology, and new dendrochronological results.
What interested me in the book is the suggestion that there may be new textile information in it also. Specifically, I found a rumor that there is an article in the first volume of the series about the textiles at Gokstad, written by Marianne Vedeler.
The first volume is listed on the Oxbow Books website with a projected publication date of this year, but it is not yet available for purchase. However, it can be preordered through Oxbow (but not through Oxbow's American affiliate Casemate Academic; I could not find any mention of the book at that site). Likely it may be available for pre-order from bookstores in Scandinavia as well, though I haven't attempted to track such stores down.
I doubt I will be able to afford the first book, let alone the set, but I am making a note to myself to look for the first book, and try to obtain it by interlibrary loan after it comes out, to see what textile information I can find.
A recent article from Archaeology in Europe News reports on the find of a nearly complete set of Roman body armor found in the Teutoberg Forest in Germany. This forest was the site of a disastrous Roman loss to German forces in 9 CE. Archaeology In Europe News links to the original article from The History Blog, which can be viewed, complete with pictures, and read here.
The armor in question is of the type called a lorica segmentata--a set of largish iron plates shaped to fit around the body and laced together. The armor was found by metal detector scan during an excavation in the summer of 2018. Unsure exactly what the item was and knowing only that it contained a lot of metal, the entire block of soil containing the find was dug up whole and shipped to the Münster Osnabrück International Airport, which was the only nearby facility with an X-ray machine large enough to fit the soil block into. The resulting X-ray revealed only a series of nails, which likely fastened a wooden crate large enough to hold the metal object, but did not penetrate the soil block. The find was transferred to the Fraunhofer Institute in Fürth, which has a large CT scanner, and only after the CT scan did it become clear what the find actually was, and how it had to be excavated.
The armor had collapsed and was crushed by the weight of the soil pressing upon it for two millennia. Despite that fact, and despite the extreme corrosion of the metal itself, the armor is surprisingly well preserved, complete with "hinges, buckles, bronze bosses and even extremely rare surviving pieces of the leather ties." Plates from the shoulder and chest that were not in the original soil block have also been recovered. There were no arm plates, which has been attributed to the design of this early piece. Restoration of the armor is currently ongoing.
The find also contains an iron collar connected to a pair of handcuffs. This item, also called in modern times a shrew's fiddle or a neck violin, was used on slaves and other captives; it indicates that the legionary who wore the armor had been captured, probably after the Teutoberg Forest battle.
I love learning about finds like this, because it confirms that we have not learned all there is to know about the past. Archaeology continually uncovers artifacts like this one, which extend our knowledge of history.
I have done nothing relating to costuming this month. Mostly that's because I've undertaken a temporary job, working for the US Census Bureau. It has left me with zero time and energy to do anything extra.
But I did find a video that mentions an insole with nalbinding on it. The video is by the Medeltidmuseet in Stockholm, and as you might expect, it is in Swedish. However, it gives a look at a leather sole with a bit of nalbinding along one edge. This find is dated to 1300-1400 CE. The link can be found on the Nalbound blog, here, which is in English and gives a bit of perspective on the find. (Kudos to Anne Marie Decker, who writes the Nalbound blog.)
Was this bit of nalbinding part of an insole? Or is this evidence of a nalbinded sock with a leather sole attached? The blogger at the Nalbound blog thinks it's an insole because the "row [of nalbinding] appears to follow the edge of the leather sole. That direction under and along the arch does not match the row direction that I see in contemporaneous nalbound socks." It's an interesting look into a different way that nalbinding might have been used during the medieval period.
![]() |
| Bearded Man in a kākahu (by Albert Percy Godber, Wikimedia Commons) |
Back in April, I reviewed two books by ChronoCopia Publishing: A Handbook of Men's Clothing and Handbook of the 15th Century and A Handbook of Women's Clothing of the 15th Century. Daniel Serra of ChronoCopia Publishing also asked me to review the following book about nålbinding:![]() |
Lego blocks isolated on the white backgroundFree photo 6223582 © Tomas Valenta, Bm Association - Dreamstime.com |
Malmborg, A. & Schütz, Willhelm, A Handbook for Men's Clothing of the 15th Century: Historical Clothing from the Inside Out. (ChronoCopia Publishing AB 2018).
Malmborg, A. & Schütz, Willhelm, A Handbook for Women's Clothing of the 15th Century: Historical Clothing from the Inside Out. (ChronoCopia Publishing AB 2018).
These books are beautifully produced. They are printed on thick, glossy paper and are lavishly illustrated with clear diagrams and large, full color photographs showing clothed figures excerpted from period works of art. But these books are very short (48 pages each). At $19.90 USD for each on Amazon.com, they are a bit more expensive than the titles in Osprey Publishing's Men-At-Arms series, which are the same length and are of similarly high quality with regard to paper, photographs, and layout.Alexander, Kimberly S. and Alison Fairhurst. Treasures Afoot: Shoe Stories from the Georgian Era. (Volume 3, Issue 2, Summer 2019, page 87).
Gurr, Alice. The Trench Coat: Fashioning British Gender Identities in War and Peace, 1851-1930. (Volume 3, Issue 1, Winter 2019, page 5).
Fairhurst, Alison. Women's Shoes of the Eighteenth Century: Style, Use and Evolution.(Volume 1, Issue 2, Autumn 2017, page 25).
Middleton, James. Their Dress Is Very Different: The Development of the Peruvian Polleta and the Genesis of the Andean Chola. (Volume 2, Issue 1, Spring 2018).Each issue also includes a substantial section of detailed reviews of new books on historical clothing; that feature alone is definitely worth the time of costumers and historians interested in the period or periods discussed.